Formulasi kebijakan anggaran pendapatan dan belanja negara (studi kebijakan umum anggaran kota Pontianak tahun 2011)
Dissertation research 'examines the Yearly Budget Policy Formulation of
Pontianak City (Study on General Policy of Pontianak City 2011 Yearly Budget).
The research focuses on interaction between the budget team of city government
and budget department of Pontianak city Local Legislative Board (DPRD) related
to the formulation of General Budget Policy (Kebijakan Umum Anggaran / KUA)
The formulated research question: "Why the general policy on Pontianak City
budget is late? The research design used by the researcher is qualitative method
The research shows that the lateness is because of lack of responsiveness,
commitment, and consistency of the city budgetary team and budgetary
department of DP RD. Lack of responsibility is clarly shown from the fact that the
KUA draft from the City Government and DP RD Budgetary Department is always
late. The lateness is intentional in order to gain material and non-material
benefits for the persons involved directly, his/her family members, constituents,
colleagues, or friends .. Lack of responsiveness can be seen from the fact that they
decreased the projection of the city local income as they also decrease social
funds for public. On the other hand, the portion offundfor DPRD and Silpa 2011
projection are increased As for the. lack of responsiveness from the DPRD
members, we can see that from the fact that they keep on increasing the fund
dedicated for themselves, such as; housingfund, and communication budget. Lack
of commitment and consistency are seen from the differences between the words
came out of their mouth and the action did by them. In addition they have low
attendance level on meetings discussing the formulation of KUA. As for the
actions that indicate their lack of commitment and consistency, it can be seen
from their disobedience toward the schedule determined earlier for the discussion
of KUA. They also break the promises they made when they were elected. Another
indicator is the fact that they make the meetings discussing about KUA unable to
be accessed by outsider, while the law clearly state that the meetings should be
open for public.
No copy data
No other version available